Blog

Home » blog » Blog

Services for You

View My
Year-End Report
HR 5382 Commercial Space Launch Amendments Act of 2004
Posted by on November 20, 2004
H.R.5382 269-120 Congressman Burgess voted Yea Title: To promote the development of the emerging commercial human space flight industry, and for other purposes. Sponsor: Rep Rohrabacher, Dana [R-CA-46] (introduced 11/18/2004) Cosponsors: 2 Committees: House Science Related Bills: H.R.3752, S.1260 Latest Major Action: 11/20/2004 Received in the Senate.
Continue Reading... | Post a Comment ( comments )
f t # e
HR 4818 Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005
Posted by on November 20, 2004
H.R.4818 344-51 Congressman Burgess voted Yea Title:Making appropriations for foreign operations, export financing, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2005, and for other purposes. Sponsor: Rep Kolbe, Jim [R-AZ-8] (introduced 7/13/2004) Cosponsors: (none) Committees: House Appropriations; Senate Appropriations; House Agriculture House Reports: 108-599; Latest Conference Report: 108-792 Related Bills: H.CON.RES.518, H.CON.RES.528, H.RES.715, H.RES.866, S.J.RES.42, S.2812 Latest Major Action: 11/20/2004 Conference report agreed to in Senate. Status: Senate agreed to conference report by Yea-Nay Vote. 65 - 30. Record Vote Number: 215. Note: The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 contains the following divisions: A [Agriculture], B [Commerce], C [Energy/Water], D [Foreign Operations], E [Interior], F [Labor/HHS/ED], G [Leg Branch], H [Transportation/Treasury], I [VA/HUD], J [Other Matters], and K [Small Business]. Conference report, as printed in the Congressional Record. H.R. 4818 is being held at desk in Senate, pending adoption by the House of H.Con.Res. 528, as amended in Senate by S.Amdt. 4076. The House Appropriations Committee has posted highlights of the conference report. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY AS OF: 7/13/2004--Introduced. Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2005 - Makes appropriations for FY 2005 for: (1) the Export-Import Bank of the United States; (2) the Overseas Private Investment Corporation; (3) the Trade and Development Agency; (4) expenses of the President in carrying out certain programs under the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961; (5) U.S. Agency for International Development; (6) various bilateral economic assistance programs for foreign developing countries; (7) expenses for the Millenium Challenge Corporation; (8) the Inter-American Foundation, the African Development Foundation, and the Peace Corps; (9) global HIV/AIDS initiative; (10) international narcotics control and law enforcement and the Andean Counterdrug Initiative; (11) migration and refugee assistance; (12) nonproliferation, anti-terrorism, demining and related programs; (13) Department of the Treasury for international affairs technical assistance and debt restructuring; (14) certain U.S. military assistance programs for foreign countries; (15) U.S. contributions to certain international financial institutions; and (16) international programs and organizations. Sets forth certain limits and prohibitions on the use of appropriations for specified activities.
Continue Reading... | Post a Comment ( comments )
f t # e
Medical Liability
Posted by on November 19, 2004
Watch Video
Continue Reading... | Post a Comment ( comments )
f t # e
HR 1350 Improving Education Results for Children With Disabilities Act of 2003
Posted by on November 19, 2004
H.R.1350 397-3 Congressman Burgess voted Yea Title:To reauthorize the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, and for other purposes. Sponsor: Rep Castle, Michael N. [R-DE] (introduced 3/19/2003) Cosponsors: 19 Committees: House Education and the Workforce; Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions House Reports: 108-77; Latest Conference Report: 108-779 (in Congressional Record H9895-9959) Related Bills: H.CON.RES.524, H.RES.206, H.RES.858, S.1248 Latest Major Action: 11/19/2004 Cleared for White House. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY AS OF: 5/13/2004--Passed Senate, amended. (There are 2 other summaries) Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 - Title I: Amendments to the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act - (Sec. 101) Amends the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) to revise programs and reauthorize appropriations through FY 2009. Revises IDEA part A general provisions, including definitions. Revises requirements for assistive technology devices and related services to eliminate coverage of: (1) surgically implanted medical devices; (2) such devices' post-surgical maintenance, programming, or replacement; and (3) external devices connected with the use of such devices. Allows routine maintenance and monitoring of an external device at the same time the child is receiving IDEA assistance. Allows a State or local educational agency (LEA), with respect to children ages three to nine, to include any subset of that age range for purposes of determinations that an individual is experiencing development delays and needs special education and related services as a child with a disability. Provides definitions of core academic subject, highly qualified teacher, consultative services, and limited English proficient individual to conform with requirements under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA). Includes interpreting services, school health services, and travel training instruction under related services. Includes oral transliteration services, cued language transliteration services, and sign language interpreting services among interpreting services for children who are deaf or hard of hearing. Sets forth requirements relating to State administration, policies, and rulemaking under IDEA. Directs the Comptroller General to: (1) review Federal, State, and local requirements relating to the education of children with disabilities to determine which requirements result in excessive paperwork completion burdens for teachers, related services providers, and school administrators; and (2) report to Congress on such review, with strategic proposals for reducing the paperwork burdens on teachers. Provides for a paperwork reduction demonstration program. Authorizes the Secretary to grant waivers of statutory or regulatory requirements, other than civil rights requirements, under part A for up to four years to up to 15 States, based on State proposals to reduce excessive paperwork and noninstructional time burdens that do not assist in improving educational and functional results for children with disabilities. Prohibits such waiver program from being construed to: (1) affect the right of a child with a disability to receive a free appropriate public education (FAPE) under part A; and (2) permit a State or LEA to waive specified procedural safeguards. Directs the Secretary to include in certain annual reports to Congress information related to the effectiveness of such waivers, including including any specific recommendations for their broader implementation. Revises IDEA part B assistance for education of all children with disabilities. Continues the permanent authorization of appropriations for part B programs, including the separate authorization for preschool grants. Sets forth a formula for determining the maximum amount to be available for awarding grants under part B for any fiscal year, based on the total number of children with disabilities served for school year 2002-2003 multiplied by 40 percent of the national average per pupil expenditure. Provides allocation formulas for grants to States (with subgrants to LEAs), outlying areas and freely associated States, and the Secretary of the Interior for programs for Indian children. Includes population and poverty components of the specified permanent formula in determining the amount available for States' maximum grants. Provides for continued funding of freely associated States at the FY 2003 level. Revises the formula for determining the amount States may use for State administration and other State activities. Includes enforcement among required State activities, as well as the currently required monitoring, complaint investigation, and establishment of a mediation system. Requires a portion of State activity funds to be used to support the State protection and advocacy system to advise and assist parents in the areas of dispute resolution and due process, voluntary mediation, and the opportunity to resolve complaints. Lists optional types of State activities, including support and direct services, paperwork reduction, positive behavioral interventions and supports and mental health services, technology, transition programs, meeting of personnel shortages, capacity building, alternate programming for those expelled from school, and the development of appropriate accommodations and alternate assessments for children with disabilities. Requires States to reserve a specified portion of part B funds to establish a risk pool fund to assist school districts in serving high-need children with disabilities or unanticipated special education costs. Requires placement-neutral policies for settings of high-need students that: (1) do not favor public, nonpublic or out-of-district placements; and (2) provide the services to which children are entitled in a setting that is consistent with their individualized education plan (IEP). Prohibits risk pool funds from being used to pay costs that otherwise are reimbursable as medical assistance for a child with a disability under a State Medicaid program. Makes State expenditure of administrative funds contingent upon its certification that agreements to establish public agency responsibilities for providing and financing part B services within a State are current. Authorizes LEAs to claim reimbursement from public agencies that fail to provide or pay for the special education and related services they are required to under a State's current system of arrangements for payments for services for children in out-of-State or out-of-LEA residential treatment or special education schools. Provides that public charter schools that operate as LEAs are entitled to subgrants as LEAs. Removes certain procedural and reporting requirements for State eligibility. Requires States to provide assurances that they have the appropriate policies and procedures in place to ensure that they have met part B requirements. Revises personnel standards to direct States to adopt policies that require LEAs to take measurable steps to recruit, hire, and retain highly qualified personnel. Requires all special education teachers in an elementary, middle or secondary school to be highly qualified no later than the end of the 2006-2007 school year. Eliminates a requirement that States develop a comprehensive system of personnel development. Requires State standards governing the qualifications of related service personnel serving children with disabilities to be consistent with any State-approved or State-recognized certification or licensing or other comparable requirement applicable to the specific professional discipline of such personnel. Requires States to ensure that such personnel have not had their certification or licensure requirements waived on an emergency, temporary, or provisional basis. Provides that such provisions shall not: (1) be construed to create a right of action on behalf of an individual student for the failure of a particular SEA or LEA staff person to be highly qualified; or (2) prevent a parent from filing a State complaint regarding staff qualifications with the SEA. Prohibits States from having funding mechanisms that distribute funds based upon the type of setting in which a child is served. Requires States to revise any such current policies or procedures. Revises requirements for LEAs to oblige proportional amounts of funds for parentally-placed private school children with disabilities. Requires LEAs to: (1) provide direct services to such children to the extent practicable; (2) provide data on the number of students evaluated, found to have a disability, and served under part B; (3) conduct the child-find process for such children in a time period comparable to that for students attending public schools; (4) not consider the cost of such child-find and individual evaluations in meeting their proportional obligations; and (5) consult with private school officials on the child find process, determination of proportional share of Federal funds, provision of services, alternative delivery mechanisms, and third party providers. Allows private schools to appeal if such consultation does not take place. Makes an LEA responsible for ensuring equitable services for such children at private schools within the LEA's jurisdiction. Revises requirements for academic achievement and functional performance of children with disabilities to conform IDEA to the State and LEA accountability system established under NCLBA, with school and LEA disaggregation of data to examine the results of children with disabilities and ensure that such subgroup is making adequate yearly progress (AYP) towards reaching proficiency. Includes provisions relating to AYP among State performance goals and indicators for children with disabilities. Revises requirements for participation in assessments. Requires alternate assessments to be a part of State and LEA assessment programs and accountability systems. Sets forth additional requirements for developing and administering alternate assessments aligned with the State's academic content and achievement standards, and for developing alternate standards for those children with significant cognitive disabilities. Requires States and LEAs to develop and use universally designed assessments to the extent feasible. Establishes requirements for accessibility of instructional materials. Directs the Secretary to promulgate an Instructional Materials Accessibility Standard for publishers in preparing electronic files for reproducing print instructional materials in specialized formats for blind and other print-disabled students. Requires SEAs and LEAs to adopt the Instructional Materials Accessibility Standard in a timely manner after it is published in the Federal Register, in order that, within two years after enactment of this Act, any purchase agreement for print instructional materials will require the publisher to apply that standard when providing electronic files for use in reproducing the instructional materials in specialized formats for students with print disabilities. Establishes the National Instructional Materials Access Center to facilitate collection and dissemination of instructional materials for blind and print-disabled students by: (1) requiring publishers, on or before delivery of the print instructional materials, to provide an electronic file copy to the Center, to be readily available whenever needed; and (2) providing a single point of contact for any entity authorized to have access to the electronic file. Removes certain procedural and reporting requirements for LEA eligibility. Requires LEAs to provide assurances that they have the appropriate policies and procedures in place to ensure that they have met part B requirements. Revises local flexibility requirements to allow LEAs to use up to eight percent of Federal funds received under part B as local funds, and up to 25 percent as local funds when full funding (40 percent Federal) is achieved. Requires LEAs to ensure that personnel development activities connected with such expenditure of funds are consistent with IDEA and NCLBA personnel requirements. Includes among allowable uses of part B funds by LEAs: (1) early intervening educational services; (2) administrative case management, including technology to assist personnel in recordkeeping, data collection, and related case management activities. Revises provisions relating to public charter schools to: (1) authorize LEAs to distribute IDEA funds to charter schools based on relative enrollment and proportional distribution; and (2) direct LEAs to provide supplemental and related services on site at the charter school to the same extent as to other public schools. Revises provisions regarding early intervening services. Authorizes LEAs to use up to 15 percent of their IDEA funds to develop and implement coordinated, early intervening educational services for students who are not receiving special education services but who require additional academic and behavioral support to succeed in a regular education environment, and who may be likely referrals to special education programs and services at a later time. Includes among such allowable services: (1) professional development for teachers and other school staff to deliver scientifically-based academic and behavioral interventions; (2) providing educational and behavioral evaluations, services, and supports, including scientifically-based literacy instruction; and (3) developing and implementing interagency financing strategies for the provision of those evaluations, services, and supports. Eliminates provisions for a School-Based Improvement Plan. Revises provisions for SEA flexibility to authorize those States that pay 80 percent or more of the non-Federal special education costs to treat portions of Federal IDEA funds as general funds to support educational purposes described in NCLBA and for other education-related purposes. Revises requirements for evaluations, eligibility determinations, IEPs, and placements. Provides that a parent, SEA, other State agency, or LEA has a right to request an initial evaluation to determine whether a child qualifies for IDEA services. Requires an LEA to conduct an evaluation and complete an eligibility determination within: (1) 60 days after parental consent is given for the initial evaluation; or (2) the time frame imposed by State law. Provides that an LEA does not violate the FAPE requirement by failing to provide special education and related services to a child with a disability as long as these are refused by the parent. Provides that the LEA does not have to conduct a reevaluation of a child with a disability if both the parent and the LEA agree that it is unnecessary. Includes academic information among the information the LEA is required to gather in the evaluation process of a child. Revises additional requirements for LEA procedures in selecting and administering tests and other evaluations to determine a child's eligibility under IDEA. Requires tests and evaluations to be provided and administered, to the extent practicable, in the language and form most likely to yield accurate information on what the child knows and can do academically, developmentally, and functionally. Revises a special rule for eligibility determination to provide that a lack of scientifically based reading instruction cannot be the determinant factor for deciding whether the child is a child with a disability. Allows LEAs to take into account a severe discrepancy between IQ and achievement in determining whether or not a student has a specific learning disability. Allows use of alternative procedures, such as those based on a child's response to scientific, research-based intervention. Requires that all procedures, including alternate ones, be valid and reliable for the purpose for which they are used. Revises exit evaluation requirements. Provides that a student reevaluation is not required upon leaving secondary school. Requires the LEA to provide a summary of the child's performance to inform the student, the student's family, and any agency, including postsecondary schools, which may provide services to the student upon transition. Requires individualized education programs (IEPs) to include a statement of the child's present levels of academic achievement and functional performance (currently educational performance). Requires the statement of measurable annual goals to include academic goals and, where appropriate, functional goals. Eliminates requirements for benchmarks and short-term objectives in IEPs. Requires IEPs to contain descriptions of: (1) how the child's progress toward meeting the annual goals will be measured; and (2) when periodic progress reports will be provided. Requires progress updates to provide parents with specific, meaningful, and understandable information on the progress children are making. Revises requirements for accommodations and alternate assessments. Provides for testing of some children that includes certain necessary accommodations, an alternate assessment, or an alternate assessment based upon alternative standards for those children with significant cognitive disabilities. Requires a statement of appropriate accommodations to be made for districtwide assessments. Requires the IEP team, if it determines that a child shall take an alternate assessment, to state why the child cannot participate in the regular assessment and why the particular alternate assessment selected is appropriate for that child. Revises requirements for transition services. Requires IEPs, beginning not later than the first IEP to be in effect when the child is 14, and updated annually thereafter, to contain: (1) appropriate measurable postsecondary goals based upon age appropriate assessments related to training, education, employment, and, where appropriate, independent living skills; and (2) the transition services the child needs to reach those goals. Provides that nothing in IDEA regarding IEPs shall be construed to require that additional information be included in an IEP beyond what is explicitly required. Allows a member of the IEP team to be excused from an IEP meeting if: (1) no modifications are being made to that member's area of curriculum or service; or (2) when a relevant modification is made, if the member provides input prior to the meeting. Requires the IEP team member, the parent, and the LEA to agree to the member's being excused. Directs LEAs to encourage consolidation of IEP meetings and reevaluation meetings. Allows parents and LEAs to agree to participate in IEP Team and placement meetings via means such as video conferences and conference calls. Allows parents and LEAs, through the responsible teacher or service provider, to amend or modify the child's current IEP without having to convene an IEP meeting. Includes the academic, developmental, and functional needs of the child among factors the IEP team must consider in developing a child's IEP. Requires IEP teams to provide positive behavioral interventions and supports for children with disabilities whose behavior impedes their learning or the learning of others. Requires an IEP team working with blind or visually impaired students to consider, when appropriate, instructional services related to functional performance skills, orientation and mobility, and skills in the use of assistive technology devices, including low vision devices. Allows parents and LEAs to develop three-year IEPs for students aged 18 and older, emphasizing interagency coordination with adult programs. Allows IEP teams for children with degenerative diseases to: (1) consider recommendations from professional consultants familiar with the child and the medical condition in developing IEPs; and (2) include related services designed to provide therapeutic services prior to loss of original abilities to extend current skills and throughout the child's enrollment in school, including appropriate occupational and physical therapy, self-help, mobility, and communication. Revises procedural safeguards to provide that LEAs, as well as parents, have the right to present complaints. Requires the party filing a due process complaint to send the complaint to the other party, as well as to the State agency. Requires, in the case of a homeless child or youth, the parent's notice to the LEA to contain contact information for the child and the name of the school the child is attending. Prohibits a due process hearing unless the requesting party has filed a complaint that meets specified notice requirements. Requires States to develop a model form to assist parents in filing due process complaint notices and complaints. Requires the school to provide a parent with a prior written notice, when learning of a parent's dispute for the first time in a parent's due process complaint. Requires parents to receive the procedural safeguards notice generally only once a year, but also upon: (1) initial referral or parental request for an evaluation; (2) a parent's registration of a due process complaint; or (3) request by the parent. Allows a parent to elect to receive notices by e-mail if the public agency makes such option available. Requires the procedural safeguards notice to inform parents regarding: (1) the time period in which parents can file complaints; (2) the school district's opportunity to resolve a complaint before a due process hearing; and (3) the time period in which a party can appeal a hearing officer's decision to court. Provides that: (1) parents may request mediation before filing a complaint; and (2) a written mediation agreement is enforceable in court. Authorizes a State agency to establish procedures to offer parents, as well as schools, that choose not to use the mediation process an opportunity to speak with a disinterested party regarding the benefits of mediation. Provides for a resolution session to give parents and LEAs an opportunity to resolve the complaint before a due process hearing. Allows a parent to amend their original complaint before a due process hearing occurs, with the written consent of the other party or with the permission of the hearing officer. Establishes a two-year timeline for requesting a hearing on claims for reimbursed or ongoing compensatory education services, unless there is an applicable State timeline. Requires hearing officers to make decisions on due process complaints on substantive grounds based upon a determination of whether the child in question received a FAPE. Authorizes hearing officers, in matters alleging a procedural violation, to find that a child did not receive a FAPE only if the procedural inadequacies: (1) compromised the child's right to a FAPE; (2) seriously hampered the parents' opportunity to participate in the process; or (3) caused a deprivation of educational benefits. Allows a parent of a child with a disability to represent the child, without the assistance of an attorney, in civil actions brought under IDEA part B as a result of an appeal from a due process hearing decision. Provides for a 90-day-period, or the period provided by State law, for a party to appeal a due process hearing decision to State or Federal district court. Prescribes requirements for administrative and judicial review. Prohibits the award of attorneys' fees in connection with a resolution session between the parties. Provides that a parent's attorney may be responsible for unreasonably protracting the final resolution of a controversy between the parties and thus trigger the court's reduction of attorneys' fees to the parent. Sets forth three categories of disciplinary actions that an LEA may take. Establishes a rule under which a school may order a change of placement for a child who violates a student conduct code to an appropriate interim educational setting, another setting, or suspension, for ten consecutive school days or less, to the same extent that it would apply such a discipline measure to a child without a disability, without a manifestation determination. Applies, beyond ten consecutive school days, the same disciplinary procedures as for a child without a disability, as long as the school has determined that the violation in question was not a manifestation of the child's disability. (Allows parental consent to removal of the child for more than ten consecutive school days for disciplinary reasons.) Authorizes a school, in cases involving weapons or drugs, or when a child has committed serious bodily injury, to remove the child from the regular classroom setting for up to 45 school days, regardless of whether the child's behavior was a manifestation of disability. (Allows application of regular disciplinary consequences in addition to the 45-day removal, subject to certain provisions, if the child's behavior is determined not to be a manifestation of the disability.) Provides that a school need not conduct a manifestation determination before a disciplinary action of ten consecutive school days or less, or prior to a 45-day removal for cases involving weapons, drugs, or serious bodily injury. Requires a school to determine that the child's behavior was a manifestation of disability if it was the result of either: (1) the child's disability; or (2) a failure to implement the IEP or to implement required behavioral interventions. Requires children who are removed from their current placements for more than ten consecutive school days to receive: (1) continued educational services pursuant to the FAPE requirement, so that they can continue to participate in the general curriculum in another setting, and progress toward meeting their IEP goals; (2) the benefit of school-designed actions to address the behavior violation so that it does not recur; (3) behavioral intervention services for children whose behavior impedes learning; and (4) a functional behavioral assessment, if not received before the violation occurred. Directs the IEP team to determine the child's alternative educational setting. Sets forth circumstances in which a party may request a hearing regarding disciplinary decisions or proposed disciplinary actions. Allows requests for such hearings by: (1) parents who disagree with LEA decisions regarding disciplinary actions, placements, or manifestation determinations, with the hearing officer to determine if the LEA decision is appropriate; and (2) LEAs that believe that maintaining the child's current placement is substantially likely to result in injury to the child or others. Requires the child, during a parent's appeal, to remain in the interim alternative educational setting chosen by the IEP team pending the hearing officer's decision or until the time period for the disciplinary action expires, whichever occurs first, unless the parent and public agency agree otherwise. Requires the hearing to occur within 20 days of the hearing request. Provides that an LEA will be deemed to know about a child's disability if: (1) the parent has expressed concern in writing; (2) the parent has requested an evaluation; (3) a teacher or other school personnel has expressed concern about a pattern of behavior to either the special education director, or to other administrative personnel; or (4) the child has engaged in a pattern of behavior that should have alerted school personnel that the child may need special education and related services. Provides that an LEA will not be deemed to know that the child has a disability if the child's parent has not agreed to allow an evaluation requested by the LEA. Revises provisions relating to transfer of parental rights at age of majority to allow a parent of a child with a disability to elect to receive required notices by e-mail communication, if the public agency makes such option available. Provides for monitoring, technical assistance, and enforcement of part B programs. Directs the Secretary to: (1) monitor IDEA implementation through oversight of States' supervision and a system of performance indicators focused on improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities; (2) enforce State compliance in making satisfactory progress toward improving educational results using certain indicators and benchmarks; and (3) require States to monitor and enforce LEA compliance. Requires the primary focus of Federal and State monitoring activities to be on improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities, while ensuring compliance with program requirements, with a particular emphasis on requirements relating to improving educational results for children with disabilities. Sets the following monitoring priorities: (1) provision of a FAPE in the least restrictive environment; (2) transition services; (3) State exercise of general supervisory authority; and (4) overrepresentation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services, to the extent the overrepresentation is the result of inappropriate policies, procedures, and practices. Sets forth requirements for substantive performance indicators for students with disabilities. Requires States to develop State compliance plans in collaboration with the Secretary, including benchmarks to measure continuous progress in the priority areas and a description of strategies the State will use to achieve the benchmarks. Provides for various enforcement measures in cases of State: (1) lack of satisfactory progress (earmarking funds for technical assistance, withholding a portion of administrative funds, recovery or suspension of funds); (2) substantial noncompliance (corrective action plans, special conditions, compliance agreements, recovery, withholding or suspension of funds and authority to obligate Federal funds, referral to the Department of Justice); and (3) egregious noncompliance (all the actions for substantial noncompliance, plus cease and desist orders and referral to the Inspector General). Requires SEAs to: (1) monitor and enforce IDEA implementation; (2) establish a system for monitoring the benchmarks in the State's compliance plan; (3) require LEAs to monitor and enforce implementation; and (4) prohibit LEAs from treating IDEA funds as local funds if they are not meeting IDEA requirements. Directs the Secretary to develop model forms for certain plans and notices, to help LEAs develop their own forms and decrease paperwork burdens. Revises data collection requirements to require States to: (1) make data available to the public, as well as the Secretary; (2) provide the number and percentage of children in various categories; (3) collect information on the categories of gender and, where appropriate, limited English proficiency status; (4) collect additional information in relation to certain disciplinary actions, due process complaints and hearings, and mediations; and (5) report data so as not to result in the disclosure of data identifiable to individual children. Continues the part B preschool grants program. Provides among State-level activities for early intervention any services which include an educational component that promotes schools readiness and incorporates pre-literacy, language, and numeracy skills. Revises IDEA part C (Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities) programs of early identification and intervention. Allows States to opt to create a seamless system for transition of services from birth through school age, including elements of part C and part B. Includes: (1) sign language and cued language services among early intervention services; and (2) teachers of the deaf, vision specialists, ophthalmologists, and optometrists among qualified personnel who may provide such services. Requires a State's definition of developmental delay to cover all infants and toddlers with a 35 percent or more delay in any single developmental area, or a 25 percent or more delay in two developmental areas. Directs States to develop policies requiring referrals for evaluation, and any appropriate early intervention services, for: (1) all children under age three in substantiated cases of abuse or neglect; and (2) all children who are born and identified as affected by illegal substance abuse, or withdrawal symptoms resulting from prenatal drug exposure. Sets forth requirements for transition from part C early intervention services to part B preschool services. Requires the Individualized Family Services Plan (IFSP) to include a description of transition services for the child. Makes transition services part of the responsibilities of a service coordinator. Requires steps for exiting from early intervention to be included in transition plans, when applicable. Requires State policies and procedures to include such exiting as a part of ensuring a smooth transition from the part C program. Allows States to opt to create a seamless system of services for special needs children birth to school age. Allows participating States to commingle part C and part B funds to better serve families with children with special needs. Provides for such seamless system for infants, toddlers, and preschoolers with disabilities in order to give parents the opportunity to continue services with the provider of their choice. Requires the Governor of a participating State to select the agency to administer the birth to school age special needs program. Gives parents in participating States, when their special needs child receiving services under part C reaches the age of exit, the option to waive a FAPE and to remain in the part C program, provided it includes an educational component promoting school readiness and incorporating pre-literacy, language, and numeracy skills. Requires participating States to ensure that: (1) the parents of children who are eligible under part B for preschool services are given annual notice and made fully aware of the differences between the part C program and the part B program; and (2) the system includes referrals for evaluations for early intervention services for children below the age of three who experience exposure to trauma or violence or both. Directs the Secretary to study the effects of the system. Allows early intervention services to be provided in a setting other than a natural environment only when a specific outcome cannot be met satisfactorily in a natural environment. Require IFSPs to include: (1) measurable outcomes, including appropriate pre-literacy and language skills; and (2) information on the anticipated length and frequency of services. Provides that only services for which consent was obtained will be provided, when a parent does not provide written consent for all services on an IFSP. Requires a public agency that initially fails to provide or pay for special education and related services, but is required to do so under a State's current system of arrangements, to meet its financial responsibilities by reimbursing the LEA or SEA that provided or paid for such education and services. Includes a representative from the State Medicaid agency as a required member of the State Interagency Coordinating Council under part C. Eliminates a requirement that the Secretary establish a Federal Interagency Coordinating Committee. Extends through FY 2009 the authorization of appropriations for IDEA part C. Revises IDEA part D National Activities to Improve Education of Children with Disabilities. Renames and replaces the current subpart 1 State Program Improvement Grants with a program of State Personnel Preparation and Professional Development Grants. Requires the State to: (1) continue, as under current law, to identify and address State and local needs for the preparation of personnel serving children with disabilities; and (2) use all subpart 1 grant funds to recruit, train, and retain highly qualified teachers and other special education personnel. Requires grants to SEAs under the new program: (1) on a competitive basis, if the remaining funds are less than a specified amount for a fiscal year; and (2) on a formula basis, if such funds are equal to or greater than such amount. Authorizes the Secretary to give priority in awarding such competitive grants to States that: (1) have the greatest personnel shortages; or (2) demonstrate the greatest difficulty in meeting part B requirements for personnel standards (which include the deadline for having highly qualified special education teachers by the end of the 2006-2007 schoolyear). Directs the Secretary to make certain minimum competitive grants to all States. Provides for formula grant allotments. Directs the Secretary to make certain minimum allotments for States that received competitive grants. Directs the Secretary to reserve specified subpart 1 funds for any necessary continuation awards for multiyear grants to SEAs under such replaced program. Allows SEAs to apply for a subpart 1 grant for a grant period of between one and five years. Requires an SEA, in order to be considered for such a grant, to: (1) establish a professional development partnership (PDP) with LEAs and other State agencies involved in, or concerned with, the education of children with disabilities, including institutions of higher education and the State agencies responsible for administering part C, child care, and vocational rehabilitation programs; (2) work in partnership with other persons and organizations involved in, and concerned with, the education of children with disabilities, which may include specified entities; and (3) include in the partnership any individual, entity, or agency other than the SEA that State law assigns responsibility for teacher preparation and certification, and ensure that such partner carries out any subpart 1 activities within that partner's jurisdiction. Requires SEA grant applications to include a State personnel preparation and professional development plan with specified elements. Revises part D subpart 2 requirements for scientifically based research, technical assistance, model demonstration projects, and dissemination of information. Directs the Secretary to develop and implement a comprehensive plan for subpart 2 activities after receiving input from interested individuals with relevant experience. (Current law requires consultation with specified individuals.) Revises technical assistance and demonstration projects to require such activities to be rooted in scientifically based research. Gives priority to applications that propose to: (1) serve teachers and school personnel directly in the school environment; or (2) strengthen the capacity of States and LEAs to improve instruction practices of personnel serving children with disabilities. Directs the Secretary to support certain activities concerned with, among other things: (1) inappropriate behavior of students; (2) valid and reliable yearly progress assessments; (3) different learning styles of children with disabilities; and (4) effective transition to post-school settings. Establishes: (1) a beginning special educators program, which adds a fifth-year clinical learning opportunity; and (2) a program to assist general educators (including principals and administrators) in having the skills, knowledge, and leadership training to meet the needs of children with disabilities. Authorizes appropriations for FY 2004 through 2009 for these programs as well as for the leadership preparation program and other programs for personnel development. Directs the Secretary to delegate to the Director of the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) responsibility for studies and evaluations (including the national assessment) of activities under IDEA (with the exception of the following by the Secretary: (1) an annual summary report to Congress; and (2) a study of the extent to which States adopt policies for statewide systems and the effect of such policies). Requires a national study or studies on alternate assessments and ensuring accountability for students with significant disabilities. Authorizes support for research on: (1) the impact of professional development and educational evaluation programs on student outcomes; (2) economic benefits to special education service delivery through more effective pre-referral services, and (3) teacher recruitment and retention. Revises part D subpart 3 provisions for supports to improve results for children with disabilities. Directs the Secretary to: (1) make an award to at least one parent training and information center (PTIC) in each State; or (2) in the case of a large State, make awards to multiple PTICs, but only if the centers demonstrate that coordinated services and supports will occur among them. Requires parent organizations that are PTICs, and local parent organizations that support community parent resource centers (CPRCs), to have as their mission serving families of children and youth with a full range of disabilities. Authorizes the Secretary to make an award to one parent organization to provide technical assistance for developing, assisting, and coordinating programs carried out by PTICs and CRRCs. Requires such national technical assistance grantee to: (1) establish regional centers selected from PTICs and CPRCs; and (2) with such regional centers, develop collaborative agreements with geographically appropriate Regional Resource Centers. Revises, and extends through FY 2009 the authorization of appropriations for, provisions for technology development, demonstration, and utilization, and for media services. Directs the Secretary to support video description, open captioning, and closed captioning of television programs, videos, or other materials that are appropriate for use in the classroom setting. Allows such support only when such services: (1) are not provided by the producer or distributor of such materials; or (2) have not been fully funded by other sources. Allows support for news programming only until September 30, 2006. Directs the Secretary to: (1) promulgate an Instructional Materials Accessibility Standard to be used by publishers in preparing electronic files for States under certain IDEA State eligibility provisions; and (2) establish a National Instructional Materials Access Center to coordinate acquisition and distribution of print instructional materials prepared in such Standard. Extends through FY 2009 the authorization of appropriations for: (1) subpart 3 programs of PTICs, CPRCs, and technical assistance; and (2) subpart 2 programs of technical assistance, demonstration projects, dissemination of information, and implementation of scientifically based research. Sets forth requirements for interim alternative educational settings, behavioral supports, and whole school interventions. Authorizes the Secretary to award competitive grants to: (1) establish or expand behavioral supports and whole school behavioral interventions activities; and (2) improve interim alternative educational settings. Authorizes appropriations through FY 2009 for grants to LEAs to train teachers, administrators, and support staff to help behaviorally-challenged students with disabilities to succeed in school. Allows grantee LEAs to partner with other LEAs, community-based organizations with a proven record of helping children with disabilities with behavioral problems, or other mental health providers. Allows funds to be used for: (1) training personnel in positive behavioral interventions and classroom and student management techniques; (2) early-screening students at-risk for emotional and behavioral difficulties; (3) attracting and retraining high-quality staff in interim alternative educational settings; (4) promoting better coordination between schools, parents, juvenile courts, child welfare, organizations, primary care providers, and mental health providers; (5) reducing the staff-child ratio in interim alternative educational settings; (6) providing counseling service in interim alternative educational settings; and (7) providing behavioral transition services to help students reintegrate into their regular school settings. Requires the Department of Education to maintain a website that: (1) is accessible to parents, teachers, and administrators; and (2) contains information on the best practices and supports available to help address the needs of these children. Requires each grantee organization or consortium to submit an evaluation of the effectiveness of the supported activities. Title II: Amendments to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 - (Sec. 201) Amends the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (RA) to declare that there is a substantial need to improve and expand RA vocational rehabilitation services for students with disabilities. (Sec. 203) Revises requirements for State plans to require: (1) students with disabilities to be among the groups whose needs are assessed; (2) descriptions of strategies to improve and expand vocational rehabilitation services for students with disabilities, and of the transition services to be provided to them; and (3) assurances that such strategies will be developed and implemented and that designated funds will be used to carry out programs or activities to improve and expand such services. (Sec. 204) Revises requirements for: (1) transition services for students with disabilities; and (2) consultation and technical assistance to SEAs and LEAs regarding planning for transition of such students to post-school activities. (Sec. 205) Sets forth requirements for standards and indicators measures of performance regarding transition to post-school activities and achievement of post-school goals of students with disabilities. (Sec. 206) Requires States, in a transition services expansion year, to reserve from their allotment a specified amount for expanded transition services. Sets forth a formula for calculation of the reserved amount for each State. Title III: National Center For Special Education Research - (Sec. 301) Amends the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002 to establish the National Center for Special Education Research. Requires the Center to: (1) sponsor research to expand knowledge of the needs of children with disabilities and improve IDEA services and implementation; (2) evaluate IDEA implementation and effectiveness; and (3) carry out appropriate research activities. Directs the Center's Commissioner to: (1) ensure that such research activities meet specified standards; and (2) propose to the Director of the Institute of Education Sciences (IES Director) a research plan developed in collaboration with the Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. Authorizes the IES Director to award grants or enter into contracts or cooperative agreements with eligible entities in carrying out Center duties. Requires the Center to: (1) synthesize and disseminate findings and results from research it conducts or supports; and (2) assist the IES Director in preparing the IES biennial report. Authorizes appropriations for FY 2004 through 2009 carry out Center activities. Directs the Secretary to continue for a specified period awards made under current IDEA provisions for research and innovation to improve services and results for children with disabilities. (Sec. 302) Subjects to sunshine provisions of Federal law meetings of the National Board for Education Sciences. (Sec. 303) Requires regional advisory committees to submit their assessments to the IES Director (formerly known as the Director for the Academy of Education Sciences). Title IV: Commission on Universal Design and the Accessibility of Curriculum and Instructional Materials - (Sec. 401) Establishes a Commission to study, evaluate, and make appropriate recommendations to Congress and the Secretary on universal design and accessibility of curriculum and instructional materials for use by all children, with particular focus on children with disabilities, in elementary and secondary schools. Terminates the Commission after its final report. Authorizes appropriations for FY 2004 and 2005. Title V: Miscellaneous - (Sec. 501) Amends the Children's Health Act of 2000 to include the Department of Education among the Federal agencies required to be represented in a consortium involved in a long-term child development study authorized under such Act. Requires such study to be conducted in compliance with specified provisions of the General Education Provisions Act, including the requirement of prior parental consent for the disclosure of any education records, except without the use of authority or exceptions granted to authorized representatives of the Secretary of Education for the evaluation of federally-supported education programs or in connection with the enforcement of the Federal legal requirements that relate to such programs. (Sec. 502) Directs the Comptroller General to review and report to Congress on: (1) the extent to which personnel in schools actively influence parents in pursuing a diagnosis of attention deficit disorder (ADD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); (2) the policies and procedures among public schools in allowing school personnel to distribute controlled substances; and (3) the extent to which school personnel have required a child to obtain a prescription for substances covered by specified provisions of the Controlled Substances Act to treat ADD, ADHD, or other attention deficit-related illnesses or disorders, in order to attend school or be evaluated for services under IDEA.
Continue Reading... | Post a Comment ( comments )
f t # e
S 2986 A bill to amend title 31 of the United States Code to increase the public debt limit.
Posted by on November 18, 2004
S.2986 208-204 Burgess voted Yea Title:A bill to amend title 31 of the United States Code to increase the public debt limit. Sponsor: Sen Frist, Bill [R-TN] (introduced 11/16/2004) Cosponsors: (none) Related Bills: H.RES.856, H.J.RES.51 Latest Major Action: 11/19/2004 Became Public Law No: 108-415 [Text, PDF] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY AS OF: 11/18/2004--Passed House, without amendment. (There are 2 other summaries) (This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The expanded summary of the Senate passed version is repeated here.) Amends Federal law to increase the statutory limit on the public debt from $7.384 trillion to $8.184 trillion.
Continue Reading... | Post a Comment ( comments )
f t # e
HR 1417 Copyright Royalty and Distribution Reform Act of 2003
Posted by on November 17, 2004
H.R.1417 407-0 Congressman Burgess did not vote as he was providing the eulogy at a friend's funeral. Title:To amend title 17, United States Code, to replace copyright arbitration royalty panels with Copyright Royalty Judges. Sponsor: Rep Smith, Lamar [R-TX-21] (introduced 3/25/2003) Cosponsors: 2 Committees: House Judiciary; Senate Judiciary House Reports: 108-408 Related Bills: S.CON.RES.145 Latest Major Action: 11/20/2004 Presented to President. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY AS OF: 3/3/2004--Passed House, amended. (There are 2 other summaries) Copyright Royalty and Distribution Reform Act of 2004 - (Sec. 3) Amends Federal copyright law to repeal requirements regarding the establishment and purpose of copyright arbitration royalty panels and replaces them with requirements setting forth the appointment and functions of Copyright Royalty Judges. Replaces the occasional three-member copyright arbitration royalty panels with three full-time Copyright Royalty Judges, appointed by the Librarian of Congress. Directs the Librarian of Congress to appoint one of the three as the Chief Copyright Royalty Judge, and in making such appointments, to consult with the Register of Copyrights. Requires Copyright Royalty Judges to: (1) accept or reject certain royalty claims filed on the basis of timeliness or the failure to establish the basis for a claim; (2) accept to reject rate adjustment petitions and petitions to participate; (3) determine the status of digital audio recording devices and digital audio interface devices; and (4) adopt, except under specified conditions, as the basis for statutory terms and rates or as a basis for the distribution of statutory royalty payments, an agreement concerning such matters reached among some or all of the participants in a proceeding. Authorizes Copyright Royalty Judges to: (1) make any necessary procedural or evidentiary rulings in any proceeding; and (2) before commencing a proceeding, to make any such rulings that would apply to the proceedings; and (3) consult with the Register of Copyrights in making any rulings under this Act. Places the offices of the Judges and staff in the Library of Congress. Requires that: (1) each Copyright Royalty Judge be an attorney who has at least seven years of legal experience; (2) the Chief Copyright Royalty Judge have at least five years of experience in adjudications, arbitrations, or court trials; and (3) of the two other Judges, one have significant knowledge of copyright law and the other have significant knowledge of economics. Allows an individual to serve as a Judge only if such individual is free of any financial conflict of interest. Requires the Chief Judge to hire three full time staff members to assist the Judges. Requires that the terms of the Copyright Royalty Judges each be six years (except that of the individuals first appointed, the Chief Judge shall be appointed to a six-year term, and of the remaining Judges, one shall be appointed to a two-year term and the other shall be appointed to a four-year term). Allows the Librarian of Congress to appoint an interim Judge to fill a vacancy in the position of Copyright Royalty Judge or when a Judge is temporarily unable to perform his or her duties. Gives Copyright Royalty Judges full independence in making determinations concerning adjustments and determinations of copyright royalty rates and terms, the distribution of copyright royalties, the acceptance or rejection of royalty claims, rate adjustment petitions, and petitions to participate, and in issuing other rulings under this Act, except that the Judges may consult with the Register of Copyrights on any matter other than a question of fact. Requires that any such consultations between the Judges and the Register of Copyrights on any question of law be in writing or on the record. Requires consultation with the Register of Copyrights on novel questions of law and requires the Register to submit, and make public, a written opinion. Prohibits any Judge from undertaking duties inconsistent with his or her duties and responsibilities as Judge. Instructs the Librarian of Congress to adopt regulations regarding the standards of conduct which shall govern the Judges and the proceedings under this Act. Sets forth requirements regarding the proceedings of Copyright Royalty Judges. Requires the Judges to act en banc, but permits the Chief Judge to designate a Judge to preside individually over collateral and administrative matters. Outlines the procedures for the participation of persons in such proceedings, including by providing for the filing of petitions to participate and filing fees of $150. Provides for a voluntary negotiation period among participants in a proceeding. Authorizes the Judges to issue regulations for carrying out their functions. Mandates, not later than 120 days after the Judges, or interim Judges as the case may be, are first appointed, such judges to issue regulations to govern proceedings under this Act. Requires such regulations to include permitting discovery periods in proceedings and requiring the Judges to order settlement conferences in proceedings to facilitate the presentation of offers of settlement. Provides for judicial review of any determination made by the Judges. Authorizes appropriations to pay the costs of proceedings under this Act not covered by the filing fees collected from the participants. Prohibits applying a certain reduction in force for full time legislative branch employees under the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1994 to employee positions in the Library of Congress that are required to be filled to carry out specified sections of Federal copyright law. Revises provisions for the institution of proceedings. Sets forth requirements for the timing of the initiation or commencement of proceedings. Sets forth a rule regarding the adjustment of certain royalty rates and terms pursuant to voluntary negotiations. (Sec. 6) Sets forth the effective date for this Act. Requires the Librarian of Congress to appoint interim Copyright Royalty Judges within 90 days after such date of enactment. Sets forth a requirement concerning the effective periods for certain royalty terms and rates.
Continue Reading... | Post a Comment ( comments )
f t # e
S. 2302 A bill to improve access to physicians in medically underserved areas.
Posted by on November 17, 2004
S.2302 407-4 Congressman Burgess did not vote as he was providing the eulogy for a friend's funeral. Title:A bill to improve access to physicians in medically underserved areas. Sponsor: Sen Conrad, Kent [D-ND] (introduced 4/7/2004) Cosponsors: 15 Committees: Senate Judiciary Related Bills: H.R.4156 Latest Major Action: 11/22/2004 Presented to President. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY AS OF: 11/17/2004--Passed House, without amendment. (There are 3 other summaries) (This measure has not been amended since it was reported to the Senate on October 7, 2004. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Amends the Immigration and Nationality Technical Corrections Act of 1994 to reauthorize for a period of two years the Conrad State 30 program, which annually allows each State to request up to 30 waivers of the home residency requirement applicable to J-1 foreign medical graduates for medical service in health professional shortage areas. Amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to exempt Conrad State 30 physicians from the numerical limitation on H-1B visas. Limits to primary care or specialty medicine the medical practice areas available to Conrad State 30 physicians. Allows Conrad State 30 physicians to practice medicine outside geographic areas designated by the Secretary of Health and Human Services in the case of a waiver request from an interested State agency where the facility serves patients residing in such areas and granting the requested waiver would not cause the number of waivers for the State to exceed five in a fiscal year. Requires requests for waivers from interested Federal agencies or interested State agencies on behalf of aliens who agree to practice specialty medicine in a facility located in a geographic area designated by the Secretary to demonstrate a shortage of health care professionals able to provide services in the appropriate medical specialty.
Continue Reading... | Post a Comment ( comments )
f t # e
“The Nation’s Flu Shot Shortage: Where are We Today and How Prepared are We for Tomorrow?”
Posted by on November 17, 2004
 

Congressman Michael C. Burgess, M.D.

Government Reform Committee

“The Nation’s Flu Shot Shortage: Where are We Today and How Prepared are We for Tomorrow?”

Wednesday, November 17, 2004

It is unsettling that with prior experience dealing with an influenza vaccine shortage last flu season that we would be in a similar, if not more severe situation this Fall and Winter. I am pleased that Chairman Davis and the Government Reform Committee has taken such an aggressive approach to investigating this health crisis. I believe that this Committee should continue this investigation to satisfy many of the questions raised by this situation. In a broader sense though, I believe that we need to look at the underlying causes of this crisis.

This situation gives us an impetus to make important changes in how manufacturers produce influenza vaccine and how we can secure a dedicated supply of the vaccine. Both regulatory and legal reforms would create an environment more suited to stabilizing the supply of vaccines in this country.

At a Government Reform Committee hearing on October 8, 2004, Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institutes for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, talked about how streamlining production of the influenza vaccine could remove many of the quality control issues that have been on display in the latest Chiron incident. Replacing the egg-growth step in vaccine production and replacing it with cell culture method will optimize production in many ways. For one, with a cell culture technique, annual flu production could be re-started within a season if a problem does arise. By utilizing a technique that is more flexible than the current egg-growth method, problems with vaccine shortage could be largely mitigated. While this growth technique is still in development and in the early stages of clinical trials, I am hopeful that the National Institutes of Health will continue to support research such as this.

Just as current production methods can constrain the availability of vaccine, other economic and legal issues place additional pressures on vaccine manufacturers, putting patients at even greater risk. Coupled with low profitability, high production failure, and an antagonistic liability system, many manufacturers have opted out of producing influenza vaccine. Currently there are only TWO manufacturers producing injectable flu vaccine for the U.S. market in 2004. As recently as the 2001-2002 flu season, the United States had three manufacturers producing injectable vaccine, but one has since dropped out of the market.

Because the government is such a large purchaser of vaccine, government contracts can act as a price setting mechanism for vaccine throughout the sector. While this may be unavoidable in the sense that vaccine delivery via public health outlets is an accepted and traditional model of vaccination in the United States, adding a legal system that can be extremely adversarial at times only serves to compress participation in the market.

In October 2004, the U.S. Congress added flu vaccine to the list of vaccines covered under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). While this program has proven to be successful in limiting liability costs for a wide range of vaccine producers over the years and fairly compensating families who have suffered an injury or death attributed to a vaccine, it just shows how deleterious the liability system was in relation to flu vaccine manufacturers prior to October 2004 as some manufacturers dropped out of the market. While the addition of influenza to the VICP list should deter many unnecessary lawsuits, VICP does not cover certain additives to vaccines, exposing manufacturers to additional liability. Because influenza vaccine manufacturers produce hundreds of millions of doses in a given season, their legal exposure increases exponentially, creating a situation not faced by many other vaccine manufacturers.

Like treating a patient, it is necessary to treat the symptoms of an illness, but to cure one you have to address the root causes of the disease. I am pleased that Chairman Davis has undertaken an investigation to deal with the symptoms of this situation and look forward to working with him to find a cure. Thank you.

Continue Reading... | Post a Comment ( comments )
f t # e
In Honor of Dr. Scott Hudelson
Posted by on November 16, 2004
Congressman Michael C. Burgess, M.D. (TX-26) Extension of Remarks In Honor of Dr. Scott Hudelson Tuesday, November 16, 2004 My remarks today are to honor my friend, Scott Hudelson of Flower Mound, Texas a devoted philanthropist and local dentist who died Friday, November 12th when the CESSNA plane he was piloting crashed near Lexington, Kentucky. Scott was en route to Chicago to meet his wife, Lewisville physician Mary Brandt Hudelson, who was attending an allergy conference. Scott Hudelson, a Minnesota native, opened his Flower Mound practice after serving in the Army Reserve's dental corps during Operation Desert Storm. He earned degrees in engineering and dental surgery from the University of Minnesota and is listed as a member of the American Dental Association, Texas Dental Association, Denton County Dental Society and Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry. In addition to running a successful practice, Family DentalCARE, Scott made monthly trips in his small plane, on his own time and with his own finances, to clean and fill the teeth of young patients at the Oklahoma School for the Deaf. The school has about 150 students -- from toddlers to teen-agers -- and most live on campus. He talked with the patients in sign language and put them at ease. Scott Hudelson married Mary Brandt on the Fourth of July in 1992. Together, Scott and Mary have three young children, as well as three older children from a previous marriage -- including a grown daughter who is working as an accountant in Tikrit, Iraq. Tomorrow, I will give the eulogy for my dear friend Scott. I cannot adequately express my sorrow to the Hudelson family, but I can say I was blessed to have him in my life. My prayers are with the family and Scott, and I honor his life here today. Thank you. Watch Video
Continue Reading... | Post a Comment ( comments )
f t # e
H.J.RES.110 Recognizing the 60th anniversary of the Battle of the Bulge during World War II.
Posted by on November 16, 2004
H.J.RES.110 392-0 Burgess voted Yea Title:Recognizing the 60th anniversary of the Battle of the Bulge during World War II. Sponsor: Rep Hastert, J. Dennis [R-IL-14] (introduced 10/8/2004) Cosponsors: 67 Committees: House International Relations Latest Major Action: 11/23/2004 Presented to President. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY AS OF: 10/8/2004--Introduced. Declares that Congress: (1) recognizes the 60th anniversary of the World War II Battle of the Bulge; (2) honors those who gave their lives during the battle; and (3) reaffirms the bonds of friendship between the United States and both Belgium and Luxembourg.
Continue Reading... | Post a Comment ( comments )
f t # e